Top 5 Most and Least Charitable States

Utah wins! Ranking number one as the state with the highest percentage of donated income. A recent study by WalletHub shows that the United States is full of generous people. According to the National Philanthropic Trust, U.S. donors gave more than $373 billion to charity with 71% coming from individuals.

Which states received top marks for highest percentage of donated income?

1. Utah

2. Minnesota

3. North Dakota

4. Maryland

5. Oklahoma

Which states received poor marks for highest percentage of donated income?

1. Massachusetts

2. Rhode Island

3. Maine

4. New Jersey

5. New Hampshire

Although the U.S. is a country filled with generous citizens, giving back is not easy to do. We are witness to a changing tide – the birth of a culture of giving instead of a culture of consumerism. This fad has become a trend that is entrenching itself in all that people do.

Five Steps to Securing a Millennial Nonprofit Board Member

On the topic of millennial nonprofit board members, organizations are all talk no action.

Boards toss around questions: How do we engage millennials? At what price point will our event seem attractive enough for millennials to come? Where are all the young people?

The millennial generation is innovative, creative, saddled with debt, and has experienced social and political turmoil since birth. 80 million strong in the United States, millennials have changed the way business is done and life is lived. They tend not to have children until their thirties (if at all) and marriage is secondary to financial security.

After watching their parents lose retirement funds and their homes during the recession, millennials exercise caution in their approach to commitment. They are less trusting of older generations but seek their guidance. Millennials lead the market place with innovative approaches to products and services, disrupting traditional industries.

The “rule book” does not apply to this generation. Millennials are loyal once a company has earned their trust, sensitive to advertising, and can detect marketing smack from a mile away. They’re techno-savvy social creatures who care about the environment, the rights of all, equality, justice, and wish for a world that is “good.”

How does this apply to nonprofit boards looking to engage them? First piece of advice, do not take the “check the box” approach. They will sense that immediately and deem you and your organization untrustworthy.

Look at their behavior and values. Sitting is the new smoking; standing desks are gaining popularity. Think BPA-free. Recycling is part of daily life. Planned Parenthood’s mission is meaningful to both women and men. They give donations to the ACLU knowing that the organization plays an important role ensuring justice for all. Millennials want to help create a better world.

They also understand fundraising. And it so happens that the number one issue with nonprofit boards is their inability to fundraise. 

In short, they are primed to be nonprofit board members.

Five steps to securing a millennial board member.

1. Identify: Identifying potential candidates is a simple process. Leverage your network, leverage your organization’s current donor and/or membership base. A board position is essentially a job, so approach it as you would if you were filling any other position.

2. Qualify: The identification process will yield candidates who might be a potential fit. Research them, look at their social media posts, discover who they are related to, where they work, what interests they have, organizations they belong to and donate to. Determine if they are able to contribute a financial gift. If not, move on to the next candidate. The board is a group of people that acts as the cornerstone of an organization and it is their fiduciary responsibility to ensure the vitality of the organization.

3. Engage: Determine the best person to make the connection and schedule a meeting. At this point, the person making the connection should be clear about the meeting’s intent. For example, “Jason, as you know I serve on the Board of XYZ nonprofit. They are making a significant impact in {insert geolocation} helping low-income folks get access to free health care services. The organization is looking for new board members willing to serve and support our community. You came to mind as someone who has demonstrated his love of community. Would you be interested in meeting with {insert nominating committee chair} to discuss this opportunity?”

4. Solicit: During this step, the board chair should be looped in to provide feedback. Following that step, board members should be notified by the nominating committee chair that a potential candidate is in the pipeline. A short description of the individual, how they were identified, and a LinkedIn profile should be circulated. A meeting with the potential candidate and the nominating committee chair should commence. Topics to be discussed include an organization overview, strategic goals, strengths and challenges, the minimum expected board gift, and a candidate’s interest level.

5. Secure: Lastly, if the candidate’s interest and financial standing are aligned with the organization then they should be formally asked to join the board – their position pending a vote by the board.

Donor-Advised Contributions Increase Dramatically

Nothing motivates major donors faster that potential tax law changes. According to the National Philanthropic Trust, there has been a 72 percent hike in donor-advised contributions. Favorable market conditions and concern over changes to tax laws may be responsible for this dramatic shift.

Donor-advised funds are most likely to be held by high-net worth and ultra-high-net worth individuals. Fears of giving caps influenced major donors in 2016. What will happen in 2017? What type of tax policies will the new administration devise? Questions with answers waiting to be revealed.

It should be noted that the surge in donor-advised contributions did not translate to increased contributions from those funds to nonprofit organizations in 2016. Nonprofits actually saw a decrease in gifts from donor-advised funds. Organizations should find solace in the fact the money is there but the check has not been mailed. As tax-policies become law, 2017 will be an experimental year for giving practices.

Jackson, Mississippi is the New Poster City for Civil Rights

Enlightened thinking is happening in Mississippi, a state that has a reputation for leading with hate instead of love.

Last April, Mississippi governor signed an anti-gay law that allowed individuals and institutions with religious objections to deny services to gay couples. A few months later, a federal judge blocked the controversial law, describing it as “state-sanctioned discrimination.”

Today, through a ground-breaking museum underway in Jackson, the state of Mississippi may be turning over a new leaf.

The Civil Rights Museum “will be the first state-constructed and state-operated civil rights museum in the nation,” stated Haley Fisackerly, President and CEO of Entergy Mississippi.

A collaborative effort between the state and private sector has led to the Civil Rights Museum, which will share the history of the struggle for equal rights between 1945 and 1976. Perhaps, in the future, they will expand the exhibits and collections to feature other groups that have fought (and are still fighting) for greater equality, such as the LGBTQ community. Who knows, perhaps other civil rights movement organizations will join the growing list of culturally enlightening places to visit in Jackson, Mississippi.

The project received significant funding from Toyota, a company that has become a major employer in the state over the last decade with Toyota car manufacturing located in the state as well as the firm’s R&D headquarters. Evidently, corporate giving is very much alive and well. Look for the rise of corporations as they continue to take on a larger role in communities that are looking to make an impact.

Cannabis Gives Back

Or at least its trying to.

A recent article in the Denver Post raised the issue of charitable giving from cannabis businesses. Many nonprofits refused the accept donations from the Colorado Harvest Company – a chain of shops and a shareholder with O.penVape – for fear of the ramifications. Organizations walk a fine line when soliciting corporate donations from politically charged companies, such as those selling cannabis.

Philanthropy is an important part of our culture and corporate giving is a responsible way for businesses to give back to their communities. Corporations of all kinds have programs that provide literacy support, funding for community beautification projects, or resources for volunteer cleanup events. Why should cannabis companies – if they want to use their profits for the social good – be treated any differently?

There are a couple of considerations that nonprofits have regarding this issue: fear of losing their nonprofit status or federal funding and the misalignment of organizational goals.

Fears relating to the federal government may be somewhat justified. There is merit to the argument that many nonprofits may lose federal funding under the Trump Administration’s proposed budget, so there is a perceived heightened risk of accepting corporate donations from cannabis companies.

Losing a 501c3 status status would be devastating for any nonprofit, and there is a lack of clarity in our legal system stemming from the novelty of state-level marijuana legalization. Can a nonprofit registered and doing business in a state that legalizes cannabis lose their 501c3 tax status for accepting donations from companies selling marijuana? Inevitably, this question will emerge in the courts.

As more states work to legalize cannabis, nonprofits should be able to entertain contributions form this dynamic and growing industry. Diversifying contributed revenue streams is a best practice solution for all nonprofits and corporate giving is part of the equation. Corporations that deal in legal commerce shouldn’t be treated any differently from the rest, especially considering that the medical use of cannabis is a legitimatizer that other substances – such as alcohol – lack.

Michigan Foundations Short-Change Underserved Communities

(Clean water protesters. Residents of Flint Michigan were let down when public water was horribly contaminated due to institutional neglect).

From 2003 to 2013, Michigan’s 66 foundations – including some of the largest in the nation, such as The W.K. Kellogg Foundation, McGregor Fund, and The Kresge Foundation – gave $10.3 billion to programs based in the United States. During that period, the U.S. was at war and was in the midst of the worst economic recession since the great depression. In a word, It was a period of great uncertainty for many.

Yet only 31% of that $10.3 went toward programs that benefited lower-income people and other disadvantaged communities and vulnerable populations, including people of color, children, domestic workers, immigrants and refugees, the incarcerated and formerly incarcerated, the LGBTQ community, people with disabilities, people with HIV/AIDS, sex workers, and women and girls who have been victims of abuse.

Support for advocacy, citizen engagement, community organizing, and long-term solutions to inequality faired even worse. Finding solutions to global income inequality can’t even begin when, here at home, we put forth limited resources for finding solutions to inequalities in our own neighborhoods.

So far, the year 2017 has brought rapid change and nonprofits will undoubtedly look to foundations for support and direction over the next decade. The election 2016 fallout has led many funders to change course.

Groups of people previously passed over for by funders have become top priorities, and programs previously considered ineffective because of their grand social visions are receiving renewed attention. Upcoming grant cycles will most likely see an influx of funding for nonprofits dedicated to underserved populations and social justice issues.

Discover more information on funders and nonprofit organizations by reviewing their information available online through the Foundation Center.

PSR Philadelphia Hosts Advocacy Training for Med Students, Health Professionals

On January 28th, the Physicians for Social Responsibility – Philadelphia (PSR – Phila) hosted an advocacy training seminar on the campus of Jefferson Hospital. The training was designed to teach a number of skills to medical students and health professionals eager to make their voices heard in the world of political discourse.

The event attracted a tremendous amount of interest, requiring PSR – Phila to compile a waiting list, keeping with an ongoing trend in the wake of the post-election fallout which has seen a massive surge in youth interest in volunteering and political participation.

As Dr. Pouné Saberi from PSR – Phila told Key Elements Group LLC President and CEO Lynette Zimmerman:

Health professionals are the most trusted voice in society, we believe that legislation of all policies benefit from having the input of a health professional. But health professionals are not trained in how to give their opinions in policy making or even voicing their opinion in general media. We hope to provide a certain set of skills that will empower health professionals and students to seek out more visibility in the public policy arena.

The national PSR organization has been a nonprofit for more than 50 years, working on a number of social issues from the perspective of health professionals. Visit the group’s website to learn more.

PricingPrivacy PolicyRefund Policy